Manual Check Copy Protection: Difference between revisions
m 2 revisions imported |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==<br /> Description == | ==<br /> Description == | ||
Originally, Sierra used digital copy protection schemes, like the infamous [[CPC]] disk copy protection. Later, they started to use included physical documents like manuals or other included documentation/extras for lookups. Miscellaneous information scattered throughout a manual all meant that photocopying (when possible) could be prohibitively expensive for the target customers and without a world-wide publicly available Internet, digital scans were almost unheard of. For the most part, copy protection methods were an effective low-tech solution to a high-tech problem. | |||
These releases relied a manual or other documentation challenge for copy protection. These challenges were usually a question that could only be answered by checking the release's included manual or other included documents. | |||
==<br /> References == | ==<br /> References == | ||
Revision as of 17:48, 19 August 2026
 |
This article is a technical stub page. You can help the Sierra Wiki by expanding it. |
Description
Originally, Sierra used digital copy protection schemes, like the infamous CPC disk copy protection. Later, they started to use included physical documents like manuals or other included documentation/extras for lookups. Miscellaneous information scattered throughout a manual all meant that photocopying (when possible) could be prohibitively expensive for the target customers and without a world-wide publicly available Internet, digital scans were almost unheard of. For the most part, copy protection methods were an effective low-tech solution to a high-tech problem.
These releases relied a manual or other documentation challenge for copy protection. These challenges were usually a question that could only be answered by checking the release's included manual or other included documents.
References
